LAPACK Archives

[Lapack] suggestion for dlamch

Sven Hammarling wrote:
Dear Eduardo,

I agree that providing a Fortran 90 version of xlamch would be good.  I 
had also suggested in the past that we have an IEEE version.

Lapack mailing list
Let me echo that sentiment about using Fortran intrinsics for the 
machine dependencies.  That would remove a host of problems, even for 
people like me who are supposed to know what our machines really do.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

For additional information you may use the LAPACK/ScaLAPACK Forum.
Or one of the mailing lists, or