LAPACK Archives

[Lapack] xLAMCH


I agree with Sven. 

We have for a long time waited to solve the problem and enumerated the 
solutions. I think it's time to move on and release a full thread safe solution.
Sven's solution is fine with me. It's a starting point (does not work on non 
IEEE machine). I am not against using FORTRAN 90 INTRINSIC as is done in 
LAPACK3E. 
This latter solution would impose on the user to have a F90 compiler. 

Julien. 

-----Original Message-----
From: lapack-bounces@Domain.Removed on behalf of Sven Hammarling
Sent: Sat 9/1/2007 1:45 PM
To: lapack@Domain.Removed
Cc: Mick Pont
Subject: [Lapack] xLAMCH
 
Dear LAPACKers,

Following the helpful messages from Jeremy Barnes, I would like to press 
the request, that I have made in the past, that we supply an IEEE 
version of xLAMCH.  My colleague, Mick Pont, has pointed out that we 
have already moved xLAMCH into the INSTALL directory, and so we could 
test for an IEEE machine at install time using the current xLAMCH and 
move a hard coded version into SRC if the machine parameters are IEEE.

Best wishes,

Sven.
_______________________________________________
Lapack mailing list
Lapack@Domain.Removed
http://lists.cs.utk.edu/listinfo/lapack


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>


For additional information you may use the LAPACK/ScaLAPACK Forum.
Or one of the mailing lists, or