LAPACK Archives

[Lapack] Some question about Lapack Benchmark


Dear Sir/Madam,
      I am a graduate student of University of Science and Technology of China.
      In my study, I need to test the performance of Lapack 3.2.1. Timing 
programs provided with LAPACK 3.0 could be abtained, but LAPACK 3.2.1 does not 
provide timing programs. I wonder why don't you continute to provide the timing 
programs. 
      There are some difference between 3.0 and 3.2.1.I am trying to copy the 
corresponding LAPACK 3.0 routines and modify them. I found the performance data 
is reported using two statistics:run-time in seconds and speed in MFLOPS.Can I 
only use the run-time to measure measure performance? If speed is necessary, 
how to count flops correctly?
      By the way, is there any software or tool to test the performace of 
LAPACK?
      I am looking forward to your reply.
      Best wishes!
                                                                                
       Cathy Ning
                                                                                
             
--
   ???
   ???
   ??????????


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>


For additional information you may use the LAPACK/ScaLAPACK Forum.
Or one of the mailing lists, or