Jorge,
Thank you.
Actually the fix had been done a couple month ago, but the link on the
website was not correct. (It was pointing on 0.94 instead on 0.95)
Concerning the optimized BLAS library, this is a good suggestion.
My only concern is that it would complicate a lot the installer and
increase the installation time (as some optimized libraries like ATLAS
take a long time to get installed)
Let us know if you have any other comments.
Julie
On Jul 3, 2009, at 3:27 AM, jdelia@Domain.Removed wrote:
Dear developers,
1) Very useful the scalapack_installer.tgz !! However, in lines
118-119 of
scalapack_installer_0.94/script/lapack.py
we had to change
# change to LAPACK dir
os.chdir(os.path.join(os.getcwd(),'lapack-3.2'))
by
# change to LAPACK dir
os.chdir(os.path.join(os.getcwd(),'lapack-3.2.1'))
2) Perhaps, in some time, an optimized BLAS library installer can be
also included.
Regards,
Jorge D'Elia.
--
CIMEC, http://www.cimec.org.ar/
INTEC, Guemes 3450, 3000-Santa Fe, ARGENTINA
tel: +54-342-451.15.94, extension 1018
tel. +54-342-455.91.75, +54-342-455.84.50/51, fax: +54-342-455.09.44
Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Scalapack mailing list
Scalapack@Domain.Removed
http://lists.cs.utk.edu/listinfo/scalapack
**********************************************
Julie Langou; Research Associate in Computer Science
Innovative Computing Laboratory;
University of Tennessee from Denver, Colorado ;-)
julie@Domain.Removed; http://www.cs.utk.edu/~julie/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.cs.utk.edu/private/scalapack/attachments/20090703/390481cb/attachment.htm
|