LAPACK and ScaLAPACK Survey Results - ordered by question
General
Question #7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK?
| Response | Count | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| no | 16 | 22% |  |
| PLAPACK | 14 | 19% | |
| ESSL | 3 | 4% | |
| BLAS | 2 | 2% | |
| PESSL | 1 | 1% | |
| linpack | 1 | 1% | |
| scilib | 1 | 1% | |
| Paradiso | 1 | 1% | |
| CLAPACK | 1 | 1% | |
| PLAPACK, Pliris | 1 | 1% | |
| ESSL, CXML (LAPACK-based) | 1 | 1% | |
| IBM ESSL | 1 | 1% | |
| IBM's ESSL | 1 | 1% | |
| Steven Kenny | 1 | 1% | |
| NAG | 1 | 1% | |
| super_lu_dist, petsc | 1 | 1% | |
| Peigs | 1 | 1% | |
| mumps | 1 | 1% | |
| ESSL, NAG | 1 | 1% | |
| NAG, IMSL, ESSL (IBM), ASL (NEC) | 1 | 1% | |
| PETSc | 1 | 1% | |
| Yes | 1 | 1% | |
| PLAPACK, Trilinos, Parallel ESSL | 1 | 1% | |
| Compact Numerical Methods / Pascal | 1 | 1% | |
| none | 1 | 1% | |
| Lee Samuel Finn | 1 | 1% | |
| Arpack | 1 | 1% | |
| ARPACK, BLZPACK | 1 | 1% | |
| perhaps the 'parallel relatively robust representation' code. It has less memory requirements which favours a small cluster. | 1 | 1% | |
| ARPACK and PARPACK | 1 | 1% | |
| BNCpack, MPIBNCpack | 1 | 1% | |
| fftw | 1 | 1% | |
| ATLAS, in-house modular LA packages for rational (not float) problems | 1 | 1% | |
| BLAS of course | 1 | 1% | |
| ATLAS | 1 | 1% | |
| some OpenMP blas | 1 | 1% | |
| amd acml library, Intel mkl library | 1 | 1% | |
| umfpack | 1 | 1% | |
| BLAS, linpack, eispack (legacy code) | 1 | 1% | |
| FLAME, PLAPACK | 1 | 1% | |