Response #1: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the ScaLAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2. If your applications run in a shared-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #2: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? Additional Information
|
Response #3: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #4: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the LAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the ScaLAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #5: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 2. If you do not use LAPACK, why? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? Additional Information
|
Response #6: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? 3a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #7: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2. If your applications run in a shared-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #8: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the ScaLAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #9: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #10: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #11: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2. If your applications run in a shared-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 2a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 3a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? Additional Information
|
Response #12: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 3. If using another package, which one(s)? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #13: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2. If your applications run in a shared-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #14: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment SpecificsAdditional Information
|
Response #15: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 3. If using another package, which one(s)? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #16: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 3a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? Additional Information
|
Response #17: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the LAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 3. If using another package, which one(s)? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 3a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #18: 2005-08-09 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #19: 2005-08-10 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 2. If your applications run in a shared-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 2a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? 3a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #20: 2005-08-11 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the LAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #21: 2005-08-15 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #22: 2005-08-15 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #23: 2005-08-15 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #24: 2005-08-23 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #25: 2005-08-23 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 2. If you do not use LAPACK, why? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
|
Response #26: 2005-08-25 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 2. If you do not use ScaLAPACK, why? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #27: 2005-08-26 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 3. If using another package, which one(s)? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment SpecificsAdditional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #28: 2005-08-29 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK? 13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 3. If using another package, which one(s)? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #29: 2005-08-29 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response #30: 2005-09-14 General1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications? 2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:
3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application? 4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems? 5. Number of processors used for your application:
6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years? 7. Do you use any other sequential or parallel dense linear algebra packages other than LAPACK or ScaLAPACK? 8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?
9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type? LAPACK Usage1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )? 4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK? 10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines? 14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the LAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? ScaLAPACK Usage1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )? 4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib? 6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls? 7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK? 8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK? 10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use? 11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines? 12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK? 13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language? 14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved? 15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide? 16. What information in the ScaLAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any? Targeted Environment Specifics1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run? 3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ? Additional Information
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||