Response #1: 2005-08-14

General

1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications?
Yes

2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:

3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application?
10,000s X 10,000s

4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems?
Yes

5. Number of processors used for your application:

6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years?
Sequential, Multi-core-thread, Symmetric-multi-procs, Distributed-shared-memory, Distributed-memory, Hybrid-shared, Widely-distributed

8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?

9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type?
Linear positive definite systems, Banded linear systems, General linear systems, Generalized eigenvalue, Symmetric eigenvalue, Non-symmetric eigenvalue, Least-square problems, SVDs, Linear indefinite systems

LAPACK Usage

1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )?
Yes

4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib?
Vendor, Netlib

5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare?
Sometimes the vender version better performs.

6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls?
Yes

7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK?
Yes

8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK?
Yes

9. If you answered yes above, which higher-level interfaces do you use?
Matlab, Lapack95

10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use?
No

11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines?
Fortran 77, Fortran 90/95, Matlab

13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language?
The symmetric packed routines should be improved.

14. If you have installed LAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved?
It is ok.

15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide?
Very Frequently

16. What information in the LAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any?
It is ok.

ScaLAPACK Usage

1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )?
Yes

4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib?
Netlib

6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls?
Yes

8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK?
No

10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use?
No

11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines?
Fortran 90/95

13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language?
The symmetric packed

14. If you have installed ScaLAPACK yourself, how could the installation process be improved?
ok

15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide?
Frequently

16. What information in the ScaLAPACK guide is hard to find or is missing, if any?
Ok.

Targeted Environment Specifics

1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run?
AIX, HP/UX, IRIX, Linux, Solaris

2a. Please specify any particular libraries of frameworks used?
essl, sunperf, sgimath

3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ?
Message passing

Additional Information