LAPACK and ScaLAPACK Survey Results - by response

[ view answers grouped by question ]



Response #1: 2005-08-15

General

1. Is dense linear algebra a performance bottleneck in your applications?
Yes

2. How often do your applications use the arithmetic precisions listed below:

a. Single precision: Rarely
b. Double precision: Frequently
c. More than double precision: Frequently
d. Complex single precision: Rarely
e. Complex double precision: Very Frequently
f. Complex, more than double precision: Frequently

3. What dense matrix sizes are most important or time-consuming for your application?
1,000s X 1,000s

4. Does your application come close to, or run out of memory on important problems?
No

5. Number of processors used for your application:

a. SMP: Less than 10
b. Distributed shared-memory: Less than 10
c. Distributed memory: Less than 10

6. Which architectures do you use or intend to use in the next three years?
Sequential, Multi-core-thread, Symmetric-multi-procs

8. Please rank how the following features would be useful to your current or planned applications?

a. User defined matrix types: Very useful
b. Using optional arguments in the language interface: Somewhat useful
c. Automatic memory allocation of the work space: Somewhat useful
d. More complicated matrix data structures: Very useful

9. Do your applications solve linear algebra problems of the type?
Linear positive definite systems, General linear systems, Symmetric eigenvalue, Non-symmetric eigenvalue, Least-square problems, SVDs

LAPACK Usage

1. Do you use LAPACK (or a vendor version of LAPACK )?
Yes

4. If you use LAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib?
Vendor, Netlib

5. If you have used both a vendors version of LAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare?
They are more or less the same, I just don't have to compile / keep manually track of updates with Debian's lapack.

6. Do your applications make direct LAPACK calls?
Yes

7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on LAPACK?
Yes

8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to LAPACK?
No

10. Is the LAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use?
No

11. From which languages do you call LAPACK routines?
C, C++

12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using LAPACK?
OO wrapper

13. How could the LAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language?
Object oriented framework for C++.

15. How frequently do you refer to the LAPACK Users Guide?
Frequently

ScaLAPACK Usage

1. Do you use ScaLAPACK (or a vendor version of ScaLAPACK )?
Yes

4. If you use ScaLAPACK, do you use a vendors version or one obtained directly from Netlib?
Vendor

5. If you have used both a vendors version of ScaLAPACK and Netlibs, how do the two versions compare?
They are more or less the same, I just don't have to compile / keep manually track of updates with Debian's lapack.

6. Do your applications make direct ScaLAPACK calls?
Yes

7. Do your applications use libraries which depend on ScaLAPACK?
No

8. Do your applications use a higher-level interface to ScaLAPACK?
No

10. Is the ScaLAPACK procedure interface a barrier to more extensive use?
No

11. From which languages do you call ScaLAPACK routines?
C

12. Please describe any tools or helper functions that you frequently implement to assist your applications in using ScaLAPACK?
OO wrapper; see above...

13. How could the ScaLAPACK interface be improved to feel more natural to your application and implementation language?
see above

15. How frequently do you refer to the ScaLAPACK Users Guide?
Frequently

Targeted Environment Specifics

1. Under which operating system environments do your applications run?
Linux

3. If your applications run in a distributed-memory environment, which styles of parallelism do they employ?
Message passing


Additional Information









Sat May 18 18:50:52 2013
0 seconds