Search found 4 matches

by lcebamanos
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:40 am
Forum: User discussion
Topic: MAGMA weak performance SGEMM
Replies: 2
Views: 1806

Re: MAGMA weak performance SGEMM

Right, now I've managed to compile all files, so I believe I've got it right installed. But same results. Anybody can show different output on their K20s?
by lcebamanos
Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:48 pm
Forum: User discussion
Topic: unsupported Fortran compiler error in magma's testing folder
Replies: 4
Views: 3857

unsupported Fortran compiler error in magma's testing folder

I am using cuda 5.0 and gcc 4.7.2, some testing_* files are properly compiled but, I am getting the following error: gcc -fPIC -Xlinker -zmuldefs -DGPUSHMEM=200 testing_zsymmetrize.o -o testing_zsymmetrize \ lin/liblapacktest.a -L../lib -lmagma -lmagmablas -lmagma \ -L/home/w02/lcebaman/acml/gfortra...
by lcebamanos
Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:45 pm
Forum: User discussion
Topic: MAGMA weak performance SGEMM
Replies: 2
Views: 1806

MAGMA weak performance SGEMM

Is that right? I've compiled magma with ACML and gcc 4.7.2, although some testing_* files don't compile, testing_sgemm does: MAGMA 1.3.0 device 0: Tesla K20c, 705.5 MHz clock, 4799.6 MB memory, capability 3.5 Usage: testing_sgemm [-NN|NT|TN|TT] [-N 1024] Testing transA = N transB = N M N K MAGMA GFL...
by lcebamanos
Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:50 pm
Forum: User discussion
Topic: MAGMA weak performance SGEMM
Replies: 2
Views: 1241

MAGMA weak performance SGEMM

I was wondering if this result is correct... I see huge difference in performance. MAGMA's been compiled using ACML. [color=#BF4040]MAGMA 1.3.0 device 0: Tesla K20c, 705.5 MHz clock, 4799.6 MB memory, capability 3.5 Usage: testing_sgemm [-NN|NT|TN|TT] [-N 1024] Testing transA = N transB = N M N K MA...