MAGMA Forum

Mark, I think your testing regimen should include the PGI compiler suit. They are obviously very interested in the work you are doing - as evidenced by their continuing development of Cuda Fortran. Also, they are now a part of Nvidia - another reason to test with their compilers. I am suggesting tha...

Hi Mark, I found the PGIFORTRAN setting in Makefile.internal and set it to 0. That helped a lot. "make" runs much furthur now, the tail is shown below: ranlib liblapacktest.a make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home1/scratch/magma-1.4.1/testing/lin' gcc -O3 -DADD_ -DMAGMA_SETAFFINITY -DHAVE_CUBLAS -...

To: mgates3. Would you please advise me on what might be wrong with what I am doing?

To: all users. Is anyone out there using MAGMA with PGI compilers? If so, I would appreciate seeing a copy of your make.inc file and learning of any special steps you took to get things working.

Thanks.

I can get the compile to run as far as, and past, the ranlib step. Here is the output from there on. ranlib ../lib/libmagma.a make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home1/scratch/magma-1.4.1/src' ======================================== control ( cd control && make ) make[1]: Entering directory `/expor...

When will we see the cgemm and zgemm equivalents?

Malcolm

Hello Stan.

1. Any update on when the complex versions of your codes will be available? And which ones will they be?

2. I read somewhere, that you would be releasing BLAS codes as well. Is this correct and, if so, when?

Thanks

Malcolm

Stan, thanks for the update. Is there any known reason that you can share with me as to why nVidia is so slow in releasing the complex version(s) of the BLAS? Technical or commercial?

Malcolm

It appears from other posts that November 14th is an important date for a further release. Will the complex types be included in that release?

Thanks

M M Bibby

I read the documentation and noticed that future developments did not explicitly include the complex equivalents (single or double). Is this an unintended omission? If complex equivalents are intended, when will they be ready?

MMB

As you undoubtedly know, much scientific/technical work is done with complex quantities. Hence, the complex versions of the codes that you have just released will be very welcome

Thanks for the good work.

Malcolm