Search found 7 matches
- Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:26 am
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18489
Re: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
Hi Philip, yes I did run test programs (although not all of the bundled tests) successfully with the dll. At the moment I require just a visual studio and CLAPACK + CBLAS. I'm still looking into compiling magma as a .dll as well (remember I just compiled magmablas). Sadly, I have very little time to...
- Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:16 am
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18489
Re: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
Hi Philip, I found the same that linking magmablas (the nvcc compiled portion) statically does not work with the MinGW gcc compiler due to mvscrt dependencies which are introduced during the compilation with the cl.exe based nvcc. I think we can't do anything about this dependency gcc just ain't sup...
- Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:02 pm
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
- Replies: 15
- Views: 18489
Re: Magma on Windows and Visual Studio
Hi, I can confirm that Magma builds on Windows. I did build magmablas as a .dll using VS2008. Magma itself was build using Mingw-w64 (32bit sezero). I will try to build both as a .dll within the next days. Would it be possible to decorate all functions considered as API with a macro like MAGMA_DLL_A...
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:05 am
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: MAGMA without FORTRAN
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3187
Re: MAGMA without FORTRAN
I don't think this is possible since part of MAGMA itself seems to be derived from the Lapack/Blas itself which is written in Fortran.
Therefore, I think a Fortran Compiler is required in any case.
Therefore, I think a Fortran Compiler is required in any case.
- Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:23 am
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: MAGMA on Windows
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3837
Re: MAGMA on Windows
What is the state of MAGMA on windows? I compiled it using MinGW, but it the examples crash at cuInit.
Also compilation is a painsome process since nvcc defaults to cl.exe (Visual C) on Windows.
I think for Windows it might be more suitable to provide precompiled libraries.
Thx,
Frank
Also compilation is a painsome process since nvcc defaults to cl.exe (Visual C) on Windows.
I think for Windows it might be more suitable to provide precompiled libraries.
Thx,
Frank
- Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:00 pm
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: testing examples: why is ldda a multiple of 32?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1564
testing examples: why is ldda a multiple of 32?
I noticed that for some routines like zgemm and zgesv the LDA dimensions are set to be multiples of 32. Is this preferred for some reason?
- Thu Jul 21, 2011 5:01 am
- Forum: User discussion
- Topic: double precision routines on compute capability <1.3 devices
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2017
double precision routines on compute capability <1.3 devices
Hi, MAGMA really seems great. However, I noticed that on devices with compute capability <1.3 (no double precision, afaik) the behavior is as misleading as supplied tests are. A lot of tests, including the zgemm and dgemm tests pass without any warning, as they compare only MAGMA against CudaBLAS re...